UK Food Hygiene Ratings Report 2026

How 549,661 food businesses across England, Wales and Northern Ireland score on the FSA Food Hygiene Rating Scheme. Built from the complete Food Standards Agency open dataset.

68.8%hold a top rating of 5
4.65average rating (out of 5)
2.6%rated 0 to 2
549,661businesses analysed

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme covers food businesses in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Most do well: nearly seven in ten hold the top score. The interesting story is in the gaps, the regional spread, and the business types where standards slip. The figures below cover every rated establishment in the published FSA dataset as of 17 June 2026.

Notable findings

378,167food businesses hold the top rating of 5. That is nearly seven in ten of every rated business in the country.
881businesses in the whole of the UK are rated 0, the lowest score. That is about one in 624.
4.33is the average for takeaway/sandwich shop, the lowest of any business type. The highest is school/college/university at 4.9.
1 in 13businesses is still awaiting a first inspection, 41,324 in all.

How UK food businesses are rated

5 (very good)
68.8% (378,432)
4 (good)
11.7% (64,241)
3 (generally satisfactory)
4.9% (26,929)
2 (improvement necessary)
1.3% (7,089)
1 (major improvement necessary)
1.2% (6,536)
0 (urgent improvement necessary)
0.2% (881)
Exempt
4.4% (24,190)
Awaiting inspection
7.5% (41,324)
Awaiting publication
0% (39)

Ratings of 1 to 5 are given after an inspection. Exempt covers low-risk businesses (for example, newsagents). Awaiting inspection and awaiting publication are businesses without a current published rating.

Food hygiene ratings by region

RegionBusinessesAverage rating% rated 5
London80,6514.4659.9%
South East78,9784.7172.7%
North West65,0404.5865.8%
South West53,8874.7773.1%
East Counties53,7164.7372.4%
Yorkshire and Humberside50,2094.6667.7%
West Midlands49,8924.5764.4%
East Midlands43,6694.7474.3%
Wales33,7914.6367.8%
North East22,9364.7475.1%
Northern Ireland16,8924.7776.2%

London sits at the bottom of the table, the only region where fewer than six in ten businesses (59.9%) hold a top rating of 5.

Ratings by type of business

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme covers the whole food sector, not just hospitality, so this includes retailers, schools, care homes, manufacturers and mobile caterers alongside restaurants, pubs and cafes.

Business typeBusinessesAverage rating
Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen127,2354.6
Retailers - other109,1024.51
Other catering premises67,9814.85
Takeaway/sandwich shop56,7484.33
Pub/bar/nightclub46,5964.66
Caring Premises38,6764.84
School/college/university32,7344.9
Mobile caterer28,0284.82
Retailers - supermarkets/hypermarkets14,5464.79
Hotel/bed & breakfast/guest house11,5904.79
Manufacturers/packers9,6914.76
Distributors/Transporters4,0494.76

Highest and lowest scoring council areas

Council areas with at least 250 rated businesses, ranked by average rating.

The gap is wide: Bassetlaw averages 4.96 while Newham averages 3.98, almost a full rating point apart between the highest and lowest scoring council areas.

Highest average rating

  1. Bassetlaw4.96 (East Midlands)
  2. Dorset4.94 (South West)
  3. Forest of Dean4.94 (South West)
  4. Wrexham4.94 (Wales)
  5. Ipswich4.93 (East Counties)
  6. Stockton On Tees4.93 (North East)
  7. Thanet4.93 (South East)
  8. Chichester4.92 (South East)
  9. Harborough4.92 (East Midlands)
  10. North Kesteven4.92 (East Midlands)

Lowest average rating

  1. Newham3.98 (London)
  2. Waltham Forest4 (London)
  3. Barking and Dagenham4.18 (London)
  4. Bolton4.18 (North West)
  5. Ealing4.18 (London)
  6. Blaenau Gwent4.19 (Wales)
  7. Wigan4.19 (North West)
  8. Camden4.23 (London)
  9. Walsall4.25 (West Midlands)
  10. Enfield4.26 (London)

What drives the rating: the three inspection scores

Each rating is built from three scores given at inspection. Each runs from 0 to 20, and a lower score is better. These are the national averages.

2.9Hygiene (food handling and storage)
3.8Structural (cleanliness and layout)
3.8Confidence in management

Scotland: a different scheme

Scotland does not use the 0 to 5 ratings. It runs the Food Hygiene Information Scheme (FHIS), which gives a Pass or Improvement Required result. We report it separately to keep the figures accurate. Based on 58,513 establishments:

Pass and Eat Safe
0.9% (503)
Pass
72.4% (42,353)
Improvement Required
5.9% (3,433)
Exempt
3.8% (2,222)

Methodology and sources

This report is built from the complete Food Hygiene Rating Scheme dataset published by the Food Standards Agency, covering every local authority in the UK. We aggregated all 549,661 FHRS establishments (England, Wales and Northern Ireland) plus 58,513 Scottish FHIS establishments, as published on 17 June 2026. Average ratings use only businesses with a numeric 1 to 5 rating; exempt and awaiting-inspection businesses are excluded from averages. Council rankings are limited to authorities with at least 250 rated businesses so that small samples do not distort the result.

Source: Food Standards Agency (ratings.food.gov.uk), Open Government Licence v3.0. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Cite this report

Paddl (2026). UK Food Hygiene Ratings Report 2026. Data from the Food Standards Agency (Open Government Licence). https://paddl-ai.co/reports/uk-food-hygiene-ratings-2026

Keep your own rating where you want it

A food hygiene rating reflects the systems behind it: temperature records, cleaning schedules, allergen controls, and being ready when the inspector arrives. Paddl keeps all of it in one place so nothing slips between inspections.